Indo-Burma
Peter Paul van Dijk71, Andrew W. “Jack” Tordoff19, John Fellowes95, Michael Lau96 and Ma Jinshuang94
The redefined Indo-Burma Hotspot has emerged as a result
of the exclusion of the Himalayan chain and associated foothills in Nepal,
Bhutan, and India (now included in a new Himalaya Hotspot, the addition of
southern and western Yunnan, and an expansion of the area of southern subtropical
China (southern Guangxi and Guangdong). The area covered by this redefined
hotspot is at times referred to as the Indo-Chinese Subregion and can be described
as Tropical Asia east of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Lowlands, excluding the Malesian
region. The Indo-Burma Hotspot begins at the evergreen forests in the foothills
of Chittagong in Bangladesh and extends through the Garo and Khasi Hills of
Meghalaya, India, then eastwards through the States of Manipur, Mizoram, and
Nagaland to encompass most of Myanmar (except the extreme northern alpine areas),
a part of southern and western Yunnan, China, all of the Lao People's Democratic
Republic (P.D.R.), Vietnam, and Cambodia, the coastal lowlands of southern
China, Hainan Island, the vast majority of Thailand, a small fraction of Peninsular
Malaysia, and the Andaman Islands of India. As redefined here, the original
extent of the hotspot is 2 373 000 km2.
The transition to the Sundaland Hotspot occurs on the Thai-Malay
Peninsula. The boundary between the two hotspots is here taken to be the Kangar-Pattani
Line, which cuts across the Thailand-Malaysia border, marking the transition
between the Indochinese and Sundaic floras (Van
Steenis 1950; Whitmore 1984). However,
other analyses indicate that the phytogeographical and zoogeographical transition
between the Sundaland and Indo-Burma biotas may lie just to the north of the
Isthmus of Kra, associated with a gradual change from wet seasonal evergreen
dipterocarp rainforest to mixed moist deciduous forest (Woodruff
2003). For example, more than half of the 544 forest bird species present
on the Thai-Malay Peninsula have their species limits north of the Isthmus
at 11°-13°N (Hughes et al. 2003).
Indo-Burma has a complex geological and evolutionary history.
The Indian intrusion into the Asian continental landmass has been responsible
for the formation of most of the hotspot's topography, including the general
north-south orientation of the mountains and main rivers. The wide variation
in land form, climate, and latitude within the hotspot has led to the development
of diverse natural habitats that support a high diversity of plant and animal
species. This diversity is enhanced by a significant endemic element, which
may largely derive from habitat isolation caused by periods of high sea level
and vegetation changes during the glacial episodes of the Pleistocene. Consequently,
the hotspot contains many localized centers of endemism, particularly montane
isolates, but also areas of lowland wet evergreen forest that were isolated
at some stage, and river basins.
At present, much of Indo-Burma is characterized by distinct seasonal weather
patterns. During the northern winter months, dry, cool winds blow from the stable
continental Asian high-pressure system, resulting in a dry, cool period under
clear skies across much of the south, center, and west of the hotspot (the dry,
northeast monsoon). As the continental system weakens in summer, the wind direction
reverses and air masses forming the southwest monsoon pick up moisture from the
seas to the southwest and bring abundant rains as they rise over the hills and
mountains. In northern Vietnam and southern coastal China, the dominant weather
pattern is the north or northeasterly monsoon during the northern winter and
east or southeasterly monsoon in the summer.
Originally, nearly all of Indo-Burma would have been dominated
by broadleaf forests. The complex composition and distribution of the hotspot's
principal vegetation formations are determined by the seasonality of rainfall,
soil characteristics, temperature, and history. The richest forests —in
terms of tree diversity and overall plant species numbers— are the lowland
mixed wet evergreen forests, which occur in climates with one to four dry months.
The southern mixed wet evergreen formations comprise the Parashorea stellata association,
characteristic of zonal yellow-red clay loams, and the Dipterocarpus costatus association
on yellow sandy soils, with low nutrient levels and high sensitivity to erosion,
which occurs locally as islands within the widespread clay loams. The former
were once widespread in Tenasserim south of Tavoy, Peninsular Thailand from
Chumphon to northwestern Malaysia, and on the lower slopes of granite outcrops
in southeastern Thailand, as well as south of Da Nang and in the hills north
of Hue in Vietnam, but now survive only as a few fragments. The forests of D.
costatus have been severely degraded, although significant stands remain
on the southern slopes of the Cardamom and Kamchay ranges, and isolated patches
in the Thai-Malay Peninsula. The northern mixed wet evergreen forest association
is at present fragmented by mountain ranges and habitat conversion, and remnant
patches are restricted to the northern part of the hotspot (northern Myanmar;
southern China, including southern Yunnan and also Hainan; the Lao P.D.R.;
and northern Vietnam).
In lowland areas where rainfall is more limited and the dry
season lasts for five to seven months, the Dipterocarpus turbinatus dry
evergreen forest formation is the natural climax stage in many lowland and
hill regions. In the driest areas, it is confined to galleries in stream and
river valleys, in areas otherwise dominated by deciduous forest types. This
dry evergreen forest type is still widespread across substantial areas of Indo-Burma.
Deciduous forests occur in areas with five to nine dry months.
The Dalbergia-Lagerstroemia mixed deciduous forest formation is widespread
on yellow clay soils throughout the hotspot. Teak (Tectona grandis)
may be a major component where soil and climatic conditions are right. On sandy
and shallow lateritic soils, mixed deciduous forest is replaced by deciduous
dipterocarp forest, which generally forms a low, broken canopy. Several factors
contribute to the formation and maintenance of this forest type, including
high frequency of fire (probably anthropogenic). In the dry, central Ayeyarwady
Plain of Myanmar, a variety of semidesert thorn communities occur (Stamp
1925), which support fewer species than most other deciduous forest types
but have relatively high levels of endemism. Some deciduous forests contain
highly valuable timber species (e.g., teak, rosewood). Their leafless period
and often broken canopy permit enough light to reach the ground and stimulate
a dense undergrowth of grasses and herbs, making these forests excellent feeding
areas for large herbivorous mammals. Historically, these forests supported
some of the most diverse and abundant mammal and bird megafaunas in Asia.
Throughout the hotspot, montane forests extend on humus-rich
soils from about 800 masl. These forests are lower in stature with fewer emergents;
oaks (Fagaceae) dominate, while laurels (Lauraceae) and magnolias (Magnoliaceae)
become notable constituents. Montane tree species composition is generally
less diverse than that of lowland forests, but it contains proportionally more
endemic species. Diverse edaphic, topographic, and microclimatic conditions
at higher elevations give rise to a range of mixed coniferous and broadleaf
evergreen forest formations. On dry hills and plateaus subject to fire, conifer-dominated
savanna forests occur (typically dominated by Pinus merkusii or P.
kesiya). At the highest elevations, on ridgelines and ridge crests, stunted,
xerophytic formations, characterized by the presence of Rhododendron spp.,
occur. In general, the diversity and richness of shrubs, herbs, epiphytes,
and acid-loving species increase at higher altitudes, as tree diversity declines.
Among them are many endemic species.
Heath forest occurs on some raised beaches in coastal areas.
This evergreen forest type is less speciesrich, but probably contains the highest
proportion of endemics of any regional evergreen forest type. A related forest
occurs on similar soils above 800 masl in association with sandstone mountains.
Limestone karst outcrops support distinctive shrub and woodlands on their summits,
as well as rich, mostly herbaceous floras on sheltered cliffs. Limestone karst
formations can support relatively high levels of endemism, particularly in
groups such as orchids (Orchidaceae). In addition, a wide variety of distinctive,
localized vegetation formations occur in Indo-Burma, including lowland floodplain
swamps, mangroves, seasonally inundated grasslands, and successional assemblages,
as well as croplands and plantations.
The hotspot is home to a wide diversity of ethnic groups,
cultures, and languages. Several language groups, including Mon-Khmer, Austroasiatic,
and Tai-Kadai, originated and developed in the hotspot, and were later joined
by the Hmong-Mien and Sino-Tibetan language groups. Agriculture developed very
early in the hotspot, and gave rise to different land-use forms, including
both semi-nomadic and rotational swidden cultivation, and irrigated floodplain
rice cultivation. Among the human population of the hotspot, there is a broad
spectrum in terms of the degree of integration with the global economy, from
the Paleolithic lifestyles of certain ethnic groups in the Thai-Malay Peninsula
and the Jarawa, Onge, Sentinelese, and Andamanese tribes of the Andaman Archipelago,
to the urban life-styles of the residents of Bangkok, Hong Kong, and other
major cities.
Biodiversity
Attempts to estimate species diversity and endemism for Indo-Burma
are hampered by uneven knowledge of taxonomy and distribution of species and
groups. New, locally endemic species are regularly discovered, while advances
in taxonomy continue to reveal that single widespread “species” actually
comprise complexes of separate species, many of which are local or regional
endemics. Socio-political divisions have also complicated biodiversity assessments
because populations in neighboring countries may be independently described
as locally endemic species, although an independent revision would consider
such pairs to represent just a single species. Nevertheless, reasonable estimates
of species diversity and endemism can be made for some groups in the hotspot.
The total plant diversity of the former Indo-Burma Hotspot
was estimated at about 13 500 species of flowering and gymnosperm plants, of
which about 7 000 were estimated to be endemic to the hotspot (Dijk
et al. 1999). A reassessment of the revised Indo-Burma Hotspot results
in similar estimates for numbers of hotspot species and endemics: the modest
losses of species restricted to the Himalayan chain and associated foothills
being compensated for by the species gained in southern China. These estimates
are, however, quite conservative: Davis
et al. (1995) estimated that there are 12 000-15 000 species of vascular
plants (i.e., including ferns) in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam combined. This
flora includes a profusion of orchid (Orchidaceae) and ginger (Zingiberaceae)
species (for example, there are more than 1 000 orchid species in Thailand
alone), as well as the variety of fine tropical hardwoods.
The vertebrate fauna of the hotspot is quite diverse. Mammals
number 430 species in 171 genera and 37 families, of which 71 species and seven
genera (six monotypic) are endemic to the hotspot. In addition, there is a
single endemic family, the Craseonycteridae, which is represented by one species,
Kitti's hog-nosed bat (Craseonycteris thonglongyai), which is no larger
than a bumblebee, and among the world's smallest mammals.
Over the last 12 years, the hotspot has witnessed the discovery
of six large mammal species. Five of these were discovered in the Annamite
Mountains: the saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis, EN), large-antlered muntjac
(Muntiacus vuquangensis), Annamite muntjac (M. truongsonensis),
grey-shanked douc (Pygathrix cinerea), and Annamite striped rabbit (Nesolagus
timminsi) (Do Tuoc et al. 1994; Vu
Van Dung et al. 1994; Nadler 1997; Giao
et al. 1998; Timmins et al. 1998; Averianov
et al. 2000). The sixth species, which was discovered in the mountains
of northern Myanmar, is the leaf deer (Muntiacus putaoensis) (Amato
et al. 1999).
The bird fauna is also very diverse, with some 1 277 species,
of which 74 are endemic. There are also three endemic genera, all represented
by single species: the golden-crested myna (Ampeliceps coronatus), shorttailed
scimitar-babbler (Jabouilleia danjoui), and wedgebilled wren-babbler
(Sphenocichla humei). Six Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs), as identified by
BirdLife International (Stattersfield
et al. 1998), are found within the hotspot, namely the Andaman Islands,
the Irrawaddy Plains, Hainan Island, the Annamese Lowlands, the South Vietnamese
Lowlands, and the Da Lat Plateau. The Eastern Himalayas and the Assam Plains
EBAs are shared with the Himalaya Hotspot.
The non-marine reptiles number at least 519 species in 151
genera, of which 189 species and 12 genera are endemic. Nine of the endemic
genera are represented by single species, among them a recently described form
of pit viper from Vietnam (Triceratolepidophis sieversorum) (Ziegler
et al. 2000). The rich amphibian fauna contains some 139 endemics among
a total of around 323 species; yet, of the 57 genera represented, three (Ophryophryne, Bufoides,
and Glyphoglossus) are endemic to the hotspot. Bufoides and Glyphoglossus comprise
single species: the Khasi Hills toad (B. meghalayanus, EN) is known
from only a few sites in northeastern India, while the last-mentioned (G.
molossus) is more widespread in the hotspot.
The hotspot's inland fish fauna is remarkably diverse, with
1 262 documented species or 10% of the world's fishes that enter fresh water.
The total may ultimately approach 2 000 species. The 566 fishes that are restricted
to the region amount to more than half of the hotspot's endemic vertebrates,
and constitute an obvious priority for conservation efforts. Endemism is also
considerable at higher phyletic levels, with 30 endemic genera and an endemic
family, the Indostomidae, or armored sticklebacks. This family of strange fishes
is an extraordinary element to be found in tropical fresh waters, and may be
remotely related to the marine seamoths. Diversity of freshwater fishes is
particularly high on the lower to middle flanks of mountain ranges, where riffle
and pool habitats in small streams have been the sites for extraordinary diversification,
particularly in the loach families, Cobitidae and Balitoridae.
Flagship Species
First on the list of flagship mammal species is the saola.
The known distribution of the saola is restricted to the Annamite Mountains,
along the border between Vietnam and the Lao P.D.R., and outlying hills to
the east. Although the ecology of the species is little known, it is believed
to be largely restricted to wet evergreen forests at elevations below approximately
1 000 masl. This habitat has been extensively degraded, fragmented, and converted
throughout the species' known range, and most remaining areas are subject to
high levels of human use. While the saola is not a species in particular demand
in the wildlife trade, it is susceptible to indiscriminate snaring, which may
be expected to increase in some parts of its range with the ongoing construction
of the Ho Chi Minh National Highway and associated road network. Despite the
global attention that was focused on the species following its discovery, none
of its populations has been placed under effective conservation management,
and the very real possibility exists that this enigmatic species may become
extinct within a decade.
Other flagships include the Vietnamese population of Javan
rhinoceros (Rhinoceros sondaicus, CR), estimated to number only a handful
of individuals at Cat Tien National Park, and the kouprey (Bos sauveli,
CR), a large bovid formerly found in forest areas of northern and eastern Cambodia
and adjacent countries, but which may now be extinct. Also of special significance
are the endemic primates, a number of which are included on a list of the world's
top 25 most threatened primates prepared by Conservation International and
advisors: the eastern black-crested gibbon (Nomascus nasutus, CR), Tonkin
snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus avunculus, CR), grey-shanked douc,
white-rumped black leaf monkey (Trachypithecus delacouri, CR), whiteheaded
black langur (T. poliocephalus leucocephalus, CR), and Tonkin hooded
black langur (T. p. poliocephalus, CR) (Mittermeier
et al. 2002).
Flagship bird species include Gurney's pitta (Pitta gurneyi,
CR), a lowland evergreen forest specialist endemic to Peninsular Thailand and
adjacent parts of southern Myanmar. During the twentieth century, the species
underwent a dramatic decline due to extensive clearance of its habitat to the
point that, by the end of the century, it was known to persist only at a single
locality: Khao Nor Chuchi in Thailand. However, it has recently been rediscovered
in the Tanintharyi division in Myanmar, which potentially supports a very significant
population (BirdLife International 2004).
Although not endemic, the majority of the world population of green peafowl
(Pavo muticus, VU) is found within the hotspot. This species has undergone
a dramatic decline over the last century as a result of hunting and expansion
of human populations into natural landscapes, particularly the spread of human
settlements along permanent water sources. Edwards' pheasant (Lophura edwardsi,
EN), a species endemic to the lowlands of central Vietnam, is, like the saola,
a flagship for the lowland wet evergreen forests of the Annamite Mountains
and foothills. The Bengal florican (Houbaropsis bengalensis, EN) is
a flagship for the threatened grassland ecosystems in Cambodia and Vietnam.
Tortoises and freshwater turtles collectively form a flagship
group. The hotspot's non-marine turtle fauna is probably the most diverse in
the world, with at least 40 (and, depending on taxonomic opinions, up to 52)
species in 31 genera. This represents one-sixth of the world's turtle species
and over one-quarter of the genera; about two-thirds of the species are endemic
to the hotspot. Noteworthy also are the endemic Siamese crocodile (Crocodylus
siamensis, CR), now greatly reduced in the wild with a severely fragmented
population; and the Chinese crocodile lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus).
Although the latter is not quite endemic (occurring in northeastern Vietnam
and southern China), it deserves mention for being the sole member of the family
Shinisauridae, which has its closest relatives in the lizards of the genus Xenosaurus in
southern Mexico and Guatemala.
Flagship amphibians are considered as groups rather than
individual species. Numerous remarkable and endemic frog species occur, but
several groups such as the Rhacophorus gliding frogs, the megophryid
litter toads, and various ranid groups stand out for their local evolutionary
radiations, conservation concern, and eyecatching appearance. Salamander diversity
is not very high in the hotspot, but the salamanders contain a high proportion
of species with very restricted ranges and of high conservation concern, including
four endemic species in the genus Paramesotriton, two of which are globally
threatened: the Vietnamese salamander (P. deloustali, VU) from Vietnam
and the Guangxi warty newt (P. guangxiensis, VU) from Guangxi Autonomous
Region, China, and northern Vietnam.
Indo-Burma's streams and rivers are inhabited by fish species
that are not only of global conservation significance, but also include some
of the extremes of size among freshwater fishes. The Tonle Sap Lake and deep
pools of the Mekong River, up to 60 m deep, are critical habitats for some
of the world's largest freshwater fishes: the Mekong giant catfish (Pangasianodon
gigas, CR), giant carp (Catlocarpio siamensis), and giant freshwater
stingray (Himantura chaophraya, proposed CR). Other flagship fishes
include the dragonfish (Scleropages formosus, EN), a relict of a Gondwanan
group that is rapidly being depleted by illegal collecting of its juveniles
for the aquarium trade.
Threats
Indo-Burma may have been one of the first places on the globe where agriculture developed (Solheim 1972; Diamond 1997), creating a long history of forest burning and clearance for shifting or permanent small-scale cultivation. In recent centuries, steadily increasing trade in agricultural commodities and timber, combined with population growth, have led to widespread forest destruction. Very little, if any, natural vegetation has been unaffected by human actions. In particular, lowland evergreen forests have been extensively cleared, having been reduced to well under 30% in Thailand, less than 20% in Vietnam, and only 7% on Hainan Island by the early 1990s (BirdLife International 2003). Shifting cultivation and logging have also degraded large tracts of hill and montane forest, particularly in Chin State in Myanmar (which, during the 1980s, had one of the highest deforestation rates in the world), as well as in northern Laos and northern Vietnam. Tree plantations (particularly teak, rubber, and oil palm) have replaced large areas of lowland forest, while coffee and tea have done the same with large areas of hill and montane forests. Nevertheless, tracts of relatively undisturbed forest remain, for example, in northern Myanmar, western Thailand, and in the Annamite Mountains.
Due to the long, local dry season in many areas, what forest remains is highly susceptible to fire. In lowland mosaic forests, fires are often set deliberately, for various reasons, including promotion of a grassy understory suitable for extensively grazed livestock and, perhaps, wild ungulate populations (for hunting) or to enhance visibility for hunting. These fires tend to result in succession from dense forest to more open forest types. In some montane areas, fires set to clear swiddens (usually maize or cassava) can spread into areas of evergreen forest (especially when this has been degraded by selective extraction) and replace it with savanna grassland and other secondary formations. In some montane areas, for instance the Da Lat Plateau, accidental fires from swidden clearance and deliberately set fires are leading to succession from evergreen forest to more open coniferous forest.
Widespread deforestation and forest litter burning predictably result in soil erosion during the rainy season. While soil erosion is a natural process in any hill or montane area, there is no doubt that human activities have significantly increased erosion throughout the hotspot. Mining for ores, gems, jade or cement eliminates natural habitats in the most extreme way, and pollutes ecosystems with mining spoils and leached chemicals. Also very important are the indirect impacts from miningquarrying, particularly those resulting from large numbers of people living in remote forest areas, contributing to unsustainable hunting pressure on key wildlife populations.
Freshwater and coastal habitats have been impacted just as severely as forest habitats. Floodplain swamps and other non-flowing wetlands have been drained and converted to wet rice cultivation on a massive scale throughout the hotspot (but especially in Thailand, Myanmar, and Vietnam), while some of these rich agricultural lands are now being lost to urban sprawl. The lower Mekong River and its major tributaries have some of the most intact riverine floodplain habitats in the hotspot (BirdLife International 2003). Rivers have been dammed in order to store water to generate electricity for countries' economic growth, or for export to neighboring countries so as to generate foreign exchange earnings. Damming a river section not only transforms that section into a large pond; it also reduces the temperature and oxygen content, and increases river-bed erosion and water turbidity, while reservoir operation procedures result in occasional or regular flooding of sandbars, sandbanks, stretches of channel mosaic, and other habitats that would normally be exposed during the dry season, with severe impacts on nesting bird species. The effects on other wildlife species are widespread. Fish species diversity in reservoirs is generally less than half that of the original river; fish migration routes are invariably cut by dams only a few meters high; bird and reptile nesting sites on sandbars or in river banks are destroyed; riverside forest is replaced by a barren, draw-down zone surrounding the reservoir; and mammalian migration routes are cut. Estuaries form natural harbors that have been developed for port facilities and industrial estates in many places. Mangroves have been converted to aquacultural (mainly shrimp) ponds, and also degraded and cleared by charcoal production, while sandy beaches have been exploited for intensive tourism. Along with mangroves, intertidal mudflats are one of the most threatened natural habitats in the hotspot, having been extensively afforested with mangrove or intensely fished by lines of stack nets, which severely impacts their value as feeding habitat for migratory waterbirds. Moreover, sand dune ecosystems are severely threatened by afforestation, for instance, with Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia).
Hunting, trapping, fishing, and collecting are integral to the life-styles of many rural people in the hotspot. Previously, much of this was for subsistence use, although several centuries ago deer hides, antlers, and rhinoceros horns were already valuable trade commodities. In recent decades, the harvest of live exotic animals for the pet and aquarium trade, of orchids and other ornamental plants, and of beetles, butterflies, and seashells has increased enormously. Animal parts have long been used in traditional medicine, and this trade continues to flourish. Recently, the demand for turtles, snakes, pangolins, bears, seahorses, large reef fishes, and other wildlife for consumption in Southeast and East Asia has increased to such levels that wildlife collection and export in Southeast Asian countries has depleted stocks beyond commercial viability and in many places into local extinction. For example, 90% of the tortoise and freshwater turtle species in the Indo-Burma Hotspot are threatened, and mass trade is the leading cause of threat (Dijk et al. 1999). Harvest of wildlife has been so intensive in forested areas of the Lao P.D.R. and Vietnam that the term “empty forest syndrome” was coined (Redford 1992). Despite some measures to reduce levels of over-exploitation, the problems and conservation challenges remain huge.
Given all the pressures that this hotspot has faced, it is not surprising that little habitat remains in pristine condition. While it is difficult to accurately determine the current extent of natural vegetation, remaining forest in pristine condition probably covers less than 5% of the hotspot, while mildly damaged, yet ecologically still functional, forest probably covers between a further 10% and 25% of the hotspot.
Conservation
The total coverage of protected areas in Indo-Burma is at least 235 758 km2, equivalent to about 10% of the original extent of natural vegetation, and protecting examples of many, but not all, vegetation formations and other wildlife habitats. Certain habitat types remain under-represented in the regional protected areas system, most notably lowland wet evergreen forests, teak-dominated deciduous forests, riverine habitats (particularly wide, slow-flowing, lowland rivers), and intertidal habitats (such as mangroves and intertidal mudflats). Furthermore, as elsewhere, there are differing levels of protection among protected areas and, when only protected areas classified in IUCN categories I to IV are considered, coverage of protected areas falls to around 6% of the hotspot.
The countries in the hotspot have a varied history of protected area establishment. By July 2002, Thailand had designated 81 terrestrial and 21 marine national parks, open to the public but safeguarded from disturbance or extraction; 55 wildlife sanctuaries closed to the public and all forms of impacts; and 55 non-hunting areas, where non-destructive forms of utilization, such as fishing, are permitted, but hunting is banned (Carew-Reid 2002). In Myanmar, 38 protected areas had been declared by 2002, and more are under consideration, making good progress towards the aim of establishing a protected area system covering about 5% of the country. Hainan Island contains 26 nature reserves, totaling about 1 190 km2, that are managed by the Forestry Department, but there are also a small number of protected areas run by other government departments (M. Lau, pers. comm.). Cambodia instituted a National Protected Areas System in 1993, since when the system has been expanded to currently comprise seven national parks and 10 wildlife sanctuaries, together covering 27 658 km2, as well as three protected landscapes, three multiple-use areas, and seven protected forests covering 18 469 km2. In Vietnam, there are currently 95 decreed protected areas, comprising 27 national parks, 40 nature reserves, and 28 cultural and historical sites, covering a total land area of over 18 000 km2 (Tordoff et al. 2004). The Lao P.D.R.
has a system of 20 national protected areas, covering a total area of 33 000 km2 or 14% of the nation's land area (Southammakoth and Craig 2001). There are also a number of provincial protected areas in the country, as well as several sites proposed for protected area status. While the countries in the hotspot continue to take positive conservation actions regarding the establishment and management of protected areas systems, their achievements are often diminished by roads, reservoirs, plantations, and other major developments within and adjacent to protected areas, which undermine their conservation.
Designation and management of protected areas is the exclusive domain of governments in the hotspot, and these governments have increasingly become aware of environmental damage and are taking preventive and mitigation measures of varying scope and effect, comprising legislation (such as wildlife protection and protected areas legislation), as well as implementation and enforcement efforts. But conservation action is not limited to governments. In most countries, the academic sector is an independent source of research, support, and initiative regarding local and regional conservation activities. In addition, international conservation organizations continue to provide expertise, knowledge, support, and other resources to responsible government authorities and local NGO partners. Notable results from recent programs include identification and prioritization of potential new conservation areas, surveys of biodiversity in many sites and regions, assistance with the development of national and international conservation legislation, and raising public awareness of threats and possible solutions for wildlife issues. Other conservation efforts include varying levels of legal protection and management of a wide variety of species, as well as local and collaborative international research into wildlife management.
This is a critical time for the biodiversity of Indo-Burma: much habitat has been lost, yet few known species have become extinct to date. Conservation has been included on the agenda of most national governments, but effective action is often too little and too late. Probably the greatest hurdle to progress is the lack of commitment from national governments to ensure effective protection of the hotspot's exceptional biodiversity. Recent developments are encouraging, but must be strengthened urgently to prevent species and habitat from disappearing in the near future.
<
previous section <
index > next
section >
‹Preface:
CEMEX› ‹Preface:
Peter A. Seligmann› ‹Preface:
Patricio Robles Gil› ‹Foreword:
Harrison Ford› ‹Introduction›
‹An
Update of Existing Hotspots› ‹Tropical
Andes› ‹Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena›
‹Atlantic
Forest› ‹Cerrado›
‹Chilean
Winter Rainfall-Valdivian Forests› ‹Mesoamerica›
‹Caribbean
Islands› ‹California
Floristic Province› ‹Guinean
Forests of West Africa› ‹Cape
Floristic Region› ‹Succulent
Karoo› ‹Madagascar
and the Indian Ocean Islands› ‹Mediterranean
Basin› ‹Caucasus›
‹Western
Ghats and Sri Lanka› ‹Mountains
of Southwest China› ‹Sundaland›
‹Wallacea›
‹Philippines›
‹Southwest
Australia› ‹New
Zealand› ‹New
Caledonia› ‹Polynesia-Micronesia›
‹Madrean
Pine-Oak Woodlands› ‹Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany›
‹Coastal
Forests of Eastern Africa› ‹Eastern
Afromontane› ‹Eastern
Arc Mountains and Southern Rift› ‹Albertine
Rift› ‹Ethiopian
Highlands› ‹Horn
of Africa› ‹Irano-Anatolian›
‹Mountains of Central Asia› ‹
Himalaya› ‹Indo-Burma›
‹Japan›
‹East Melanesian
Islands› ‹Taiwan›
‹Queensland
Wet Tropics› ‹References›
‹Addresses› ‹Acknowledgements›
‹Image
Captions and Photographer Credits›
|